Singapore Says Current Labour Rights are Sufficient — Are They?
On 28 September 2026, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) confirmed that the outcome report of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) was formally adopted. The Straits Times reported that “Singapore supports 71% of human rights recommendations by UN member states”. In our analysis of the compiled list of recommendations and our government’s response, 119 of the 243 recommendations accepted were to continue existing efforts and about 15 were to consider further action. Supporting recommendations does not necessarily mean committing to substantive reform.
The government gave justifications for not supporting specific recommendations. This included extending the Employment Act (EA) and the Work Injury Compensation Act (WICA) protections to domestic workers:
“Singapore recognises that migrant domestic workers require additional protection and we have enacted more customised legislation, namely, the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990, to recognise the demands of their work environments and better meet their unique protection needs.”
While the relevant recommendations were formally “noted”, does the EFMA really function to "better meet [MDWs'] unique protection needs?" Let’s compare the essential protections defined in the EFMA with the EA and the Work Injury Compensation Act (WICA), both of which exclude MDWs.
If EFMA is designed to meet domestic workers’ unique protection needs, why does it exclude them from basic employment rights? Other migrant workers are covered by both EA and EFMA.
What’s Next in the UPR Process
The UPR is a State-driven peer-review mechanism of the UN Human Rights Council that assesses the human rights records and obligations of the 193 UN member states about every 5 years. The UPR process can be broken down into 3 stages, we are at the start of the implementation stage. This is when the state is responsible for implementing the accepted recommendations and civil society groups as well as national human rights institutions track progress and continue advocacy.
To learn more about the UPR and HOME’s involvement as a civil society stakeholder, see our previous UPR post and read HOME and TWC2’s joint UPR submission.
Published 20 October 2026